Saharan/Sahelian Commentary Manuscripts Transcriptions

Evidence

"The rest is difficult to read because the folio margin is ripped."

Remarks

The paper substrate across the examined manuscripts shows significant mechanical damage and deterioration. Specific instances include ripped folio margins (p. 300, Footnote 1033) and general 'paper damage' (p. 308, Footnote 1035) that rendered sections of the marginal commentary partly illegible. Similar issues are noted in later folios where paper damage obscures both the main text and the gloss (p. 315, Footnotes 1041 and 1042).