smudged with ink
Istanbul
18th Century
Source: Titus Nemeth (2022). Overlooked: The Role of Craft in the Adoption of Typography.
Recipe Details
Preparation Steps
The ink application in this 1730 publication is described as problematic, exhibiting poor alignment and insufficient interlinear space. The process resulted in frequent smudging, which created opaque dark spots that obstructed legibility. Conversely, some areas suffered from under-inking, where letters were barely visible (p. 57).
Original Recipe Text
The ink application in this 1730 publication is described as problematic, exhibiting poor alignment and insufficient interlinear space. The process resulted in frequent smudging, which created opaque dark spots that obstructed legibility. Conversely, some areas suffered from under-inking, where letters were barely visible (p. 57).
Evidence
"the typeforms are frequently smudged with ink, creating dark spots on the page and rendering individual letters illegible; in other instances individual letters are barely inked and difficult to see at all."
Remarks
This sample from the Müteferrika press demonstrates the challenges of early Ottoman movable type printing compared to manuscript traditions. The haphazard appearance is attributed to inconsistent spacing, varying angles of vertical strokes, and poor control over the ink volume during the printing of the Gülšen-i ḫulefā (p. 57).
Scientific Analysis
Analytical Techniques
Visual examination
Certainty Level
Inferred
Instrumentally Verified
Not Verified
Metadata
Material Type
ink
Colordark spots
RegionIstanbul
Approx. Year1750
Source Information
AuthorTitus Nemeth
CollectionIstanbul
Language
N/A
AI Suggestions
Find similar recipes based on ingredients and preparation methods.